There is a lazy argument that because young people today are digital natives (i.e. people who have grown up with computer technology and use that technology in their day-to-day lives) that this group will therefore naturally be attracted to computer science, in the broad sense, as a topic of study. Would engineers have made the same argument about telephones in the 1980’s, that because teenagers spend their time chatting on the phone that they will therefore be interested in communications engineering? I don’t think this sort of argument was made then—is the current argument any more coherent than that would be?