{"id":618,"date":"2011-09-21T21:03:44","date_gmt":"2011-09-21T21:03:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/colinjohnson.me.uk\/blog\/?p=618"},"modified":"2011-09-21T21:03:44","modified_gmt":"2011-09-21T21:03:44","slug":"shibboleth-1","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/colinjohnson.me.uk\/blog\/?p=618","title":{"rendered":"Shibboleth (1)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>It is commonly stated that in-groups within e.g. careers or activities use specific language as a way of ensuring the coherence of the group and to exclude outsiders. I&#8217;m not too sure how reasonable this is\u2014I can see some examples of it, but the argument often just boils over into the whole &#8220;all jargon is just obfuscation&#8221; argument, which seems wrong to me. <\/p>\n<p>However, there is a variant on this which I think is more interesting. That is, the use of specific <em>generic<\/em> terms by people within a group. Comedians always refer to the places that they work in as &#8220;rooms&#8221;, and people in the theatre talk about &#8220;spaces&#8221;. IT people call computers &#8220;machines&#8221;. Classical musicians refer to the individual bits of music as &#8220;pieces&#8221;, and in music theatre the words are called the &#8220;book&#8221;. Is it possible that these specific choices act as these kind of in-group markers? Or is that just arbitrary\u2014you have to call it something, and so you end up settling on one specific term? But, that argument seems a little flaky\u2014there are also some perfectly good <em>non-generic<\/em> terms that could be used instead, that are if anything more informative\u2014e.g. &#8220;computer&#8221; rather than &#8220;machine&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>I wonder if this has been studied properly at any point?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It is commonly stated that in-groups within e.g. careers or activities use specific language as a way of ensuring the coherence of the group and to exclude outsiders. I&#8217;m not too sure how reasonable this is\u2014I can see some examples of it, but the argument often just boils over into the whole &#8220;all jargon is [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"spay_email":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true},"categories":[42,21,47],"tags":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/colinjohnson.me.uk\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/618"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/colinjohnson.me.uk\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/colinjohnson.me.uk\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/colinjohnson.me.uk\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/colinjohnson.me.uk\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=618"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/colinjohnson.me.uk\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/618\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":620,"href":"https:\/\/colinjohnson.me.uk\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/618\/revisions\/620"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/colinjohnson.me.uk\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=618"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/colinjohnson.me.uk\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=618"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/colinjohnson.me.uk\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=618"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}